This was the first time I saw the Pocophone camera really start to struggle. The soft tarmac/asphalt was actually a tiny bit darker than either image has produced, so you could knock them both down in that instance if you were being overly harsh.Ī look again at the grass in the far distance and you can see just how blurry and mushy the Pocophone image is. The Pixel does what it does best, the skyline looks gorgeous and even though are plenty of shadows, there is so much extra detail and intricacy. It has literally lost all detail and definition although the foreground and park gym equipment is still really sharp and clear. Look at that overblown sky and surround from the Pocophone. I took this picture and didn’t even realize until getting home and comparing just how much it shows the somewhat major differences between the two camera results. For me, there is absolutely no disgrace in the Pocophone losing out to the Pixel here. This was taken on a really bright day but in a shaded area and the increased exposure, whilst visually appealing, just isn’t even remotely accurate. Looking at the sky again shows you the difference between both cameras again. There is less noise and the colors are just way more accurate. Sat at a larger screen it’s clear that especially in the far reaches of this image the Pixel really is crushing the Pocophone. One issue I’ve often found is that when looking at the phone display directly after taking, you can’t quite see the little nuances of each image. The Pocophone does a fantastic job with some post-processing that gives the nearby wall and viewing platform a little more life and light. The Pixel has superb accuracy, especially with the far shoreline and trees that line it. I prefer aspects of each image from each camera. Look at how well both cameras have faired.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |